
as the angle from the median plane to a vertical plane containing
the source and the z azis, and then measures the elevation
as the angle up from the horizontal plane. With this choice,
surfaces of constant azimuth are planes through the z axis, and surfaces
of constant elevation are cones concentric about the z axis. 
An important alternative is the interaural-polar
coordinate system, shown above on the right. Here one first measures
the elevation as the angle from the horizontal plane to a plane through
the source and the x axis, which is the interaural axis; the azimuth is
then measured as the angle over from the median plane. With this choice,
surfaces of constant elevation are planes through the interaural axis, and
surfaces of constant azimuth are cones concentric with the interaural axis.
The vertical-polar system is definitely more convenient for describing sources
that are confined to the horizontal plane, since one merely has to specify
the azimuth as an angle between -180° and +180°. With the interaural-polar
system, the azimuth is always between -90° and +90°; surprisingly,
the front/back distinction must be specified by the elevation, which is
0° for sources in the front horizontal plane, and 180° (or -180°)
for sources in the back. While that is certainly clumsy, we
shall see that the interaural-polar system makes it significantly simpler
to express interaural differences at all elevations.
On to Azimuth Cues
Up to
Psychoacoustics